[#75387]
Written by: Funny Man [20/01/2008, 14:09]
funny man review: 24
the leader of the vampires in lost boys now tries his hand at playing rogue cop
jack bower. 24 is an interesting and original show. the show is only let down by
a few glaring mistakes. the show is 6 seasons running, and as each season
progresses bower is fighting his tiredness even more. although one thing puzzles
funny man, and that is, bower is 6 consecutive days going without sleep and
doing drugs, why has he not collapsed yet? the glaring continuity problems,
annoying phone tones (which all happen to be the same - highly unlikely) and
product placement take away from what could be an otherwise great show.
5/10 - average.
[#75405]
Written by: fridgist [20/01/2008, 20:09]
also, not that i've seen past the first two series...but i really don't think
its set over consecutive days. i mean in one season he's been undercover
somewhere for ages and got addicted to drugs, if you think about that for a
second (the drugs you refenced briefly in your 'opinion' read: baseless
idiocy) you would realise that it would be impossible for each season to be
based one day after the next. unless a man can grow a jesus sized beard in
the space of one day (keifer is quite hench, but i don't think even he could
pull that off)
why don't you ever actually watch the shows you review and/or do some
research? simple stuff like: his name (bauer)
normally, people who review television shows have more than just a passing
interest in them, do their research and generally know their stuff. you tick
none of the required boxes.
[#75840]
Written by: Funny Man [25/01/2008, 04:03]
Quote by coldblood
Quote by funny man
funny man review: q.i. (quite interesting)
this should be called n.i. - not interesting. pointless dross accompanied by a
noticeable shoestring budget for the production. the appointment of stephen fry
to serve as bumbling numbskull, sorry "presenter", is still completely baffling.
the laughs are non-existent, and after the show ends it will leave you with a
very severe headache. one dimensional, wooden, robotic characters all contribute
to the farce that this is. the script writers should all be shot along with any
fans of the show. utterly frustrating and uncontrollably infuriating.
3/10 - what a mess....
break it off in your arse, sweetheart. some of us actually appreciate
intellectual programming, programming that engages you and makes you think,
rather than most of the other drivel on tv. were you to actually provide more
than your ridiculous "blurbs" that rarely do any show justice, be they average
or not (but then, to you, all shows are average or less, aren't they? except
heroes, which i only believe you gave high marks because you are a tool yourself
and have little actual creative insight.), then perhaps you would gain more
accord and your reviews would spark actual debate instead of the soulless bile
that accompanies most of your "reviews". what is utterly frustrating and
uncontrollably infuriating is the little effort you give your reviews and the
arrogance that compels you to defend them, which only results in a neverending
cycle. learn to justify your claims instead of just throwing up all over a page.
stupid twat.
(i personally think q.i. is a tremendous show; seeing how it is the most popular
program on bbc4, perhaps it is you who should be shot. and it's a quiz show, it
doesn't have characters. no wonder you have a headache after it, it must be a
hassle trying to get those velcro shoes off. go ahead, call me a tool...)
ok, tool.
what a noob.
[#75847]
Written by: Funny Man [25/01/2008, 07:39]
here's your standard answer, noob:
stay tuned for the next funny man review: prison break.
much love to all the funny man fans.
[#76156]
Written by: crapshoot [29/01/2008, 09:49]
funny man review request: kyle.xy
wondering if it's anything interesting or unique..?
[#77033]
Written by: Funny Man [02/02/2008, 17:54]
funny man review: prison break
set to the backdrop of a mass conspiracy, prison break follows the tale of one
hapless hitman, enrique sucr
[#77600]
Written by: Funny Man [05/02/2008, 18:38]
stay tuned for the next funny man review: (as requested) kyle xy.
much love to all the funny man fans.
[#78047]
Written by: Funny Man [07/02/2008, 16:55]
funny man review: kyle xy
funny man gave this a try a few months back. what a mistake that proved to be.
the entire cast are an insult to us actors. the storyline is boring and does not
hold your interest. the comedy is nowhere to be found. the script writing,
production and special effects are atrocious and sometimes funny man felt that
the joke was on him by giving this garbage the time of day.
2/10 - kyle xyzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
[#79892]
Written by: Funny Man [17/02/2008, 22:44]
back by popular demand. eztv's most talked about, and entertaining thread
returns for season 2 of funny man show reviews.
stay tuned for the season premiere funny man review: breaking bad.
much love to all the funny man fans.
what the papers are saying:
"funny man is back! and better than ever!" - new york times.
"many feared that it was curtains for funny man, but funny man returns with an
even more insightful and witty thread." - time magazine.
"funny man is the internet!" - the sun (uk)
[#79897]
Written by: 12916studios [17/02/2008, 23:57]
what i really find most humorous here is that i am not laughing at all. quite
the opposite really, because your prison break bs just pissed me off.
suddenly i understand why you are flamed.
[#79900]
Written by: Funny Man [18/02/2008, 00:02]
Quote by 12916studios
what i really find most humorous here is that i am not
laughing at all. quite
the opposite really, because your prison break bs just pissed me off.
suddenly i understand why you are flamed.
you are not laughing because you're a noob. wise up, noob!
much love to all the funny man fans.
[#79904]
Written by: 12916studios [18/02/2008, 00:28]
what fans?
i'm not laughing because i am well aware of what is funny...and what is not.
and this...is not.
[#79916]
Written by: 12916studios [18/02/2008, 04:38]
i smell something. could it be? is that...? wait. yes! i think it is! it's
bullshit laced with narcissism.
[#80073]
Written by: kurai [18/02/2008, 15:06]
i think it's more fundamental and altogether more straightforward ...
funny man simply doesn't comprehend humour.
he's seen it happen elsewhere, and seen the target audience's reactions but
deep down has a basic inability to distinguish the "how" from the "why".
he can follow all the basic iterative steps seen elsewhere but doesn't
understand that his efforts ultimately don't result in anything that's
actually funny.
it's like watching a pet monkey trying to copy the actions of it's owner.
the basic behaviour mimicry is there but it has no idea at all of how the
action actually leads to a result.
[#80413]
Written by: Funny Man [20/02/2008, 03:26]
Quote by 12916studios
what fans?
i'm not laughing because i am well aware of what is funny...and what is not.
and this...is not.
stick this in your pipe and smoke it, noob.
(from an earlier funny man reviews thread post):
q2: where are your fans?
funny man fans normally read the review, enjoy it, then pm funny man telling him
how ace his work is. they don't feel the need to launch into keyboard warfare
off the bat of a review they don't "agree" with.
