[#49573]
Written by: saintdesy [05/08/2007, 11:21]
Quote by fartknocker
(dmfaust, you beat me to it. that was a cogent response.)
anyway, good for you, dunlap. i'll rest easy knowing that one of the best
employees at mcdonalds is often times "prety fucking stoned." i'll also be sure
to tip you an extra quid the next time i happen to order my super-sized-full-of-
transfat-fries at your workplace. you say you're "healthy, reliable and
intelligent"? it's all relative (i'm sure you are...when compared to a poo-
flinging monkey.) ;-)
come live where i do for a couple of years. you'll find all sorts of highly
successful people who smoke weed. i've personally known biochemists,
businessmen, real-estate people, city councilmen, college professors, all
successful people, who smoke weed from time to time.
[#49574]
Written by: fartknocker [05/08/2007, 11:24]
Quote by channel_dunlap
you're free to jump to whatever conclusions you'd like. if you've never met a
successful pothead, i can see why you'd assume we're all losers. it's hard to
look past a lifetime of propaganda telling you exactly that. but the fact is, i
have a real job. granted i'm not the ceo of a fortune 500 company or anything
(though i'm sure there are some who get high), but suffice to see, i'm not
flipping burgers.
and if you're suggesting everything unhealthy should be outlawed, maybe you
should be paying more attention to the fast food places than the potheads who
work there, eh? i'm a supporter of the idea that people should be allowed to do
whatever they want so long as it's not infringing on anybody else's rights.
perhaps thats where we differ.
1. i never assumed that you're all losers.
2. i never suggested that everything unhealthy should be outlawed.
perhaps all that pot smoking is affecting your reading comprehesion and your
ability to form a persuasive argument, sport? ;-)
[#49576]
Written by: aroyals [05/08/2007, 11:29]
Quote by saintdesy
come live where i do for a couple of years. you'll find all sorts of highly
successful people who smoke weed. i've personally known biochemists,
businessmen, real-estate people, city councilmen, college professors, all
successful people, who smoke weed from time to time.
i hear that. my cousin would study for 10 mins or so for his year 12 exams then
get bored and smoke weed for the rest of the (school) night, that didn't stop
him from getting a 92 enter score and beating everyone else in his 2 math exams
and physics exam. now he's working his dream job at a video game designing
firm/place ?!?! w/e and smokes everyday.
[#49579]
Written by: kropo [05/08/2007, 12:13]
this is actually pretty good. thanks.
[#49591]
Written by: homeer [05/08/2007, 13:40]
i can't believe a bunch of intellectual property thieves are debating the morality and legality of pot use.
just hilarious.
[#49592]
Written by: Harry_Q_Hammer [05/08/2007, 13:50]
homeer is a wanker.
[#49595]
Written by: slundered [05/08/2007, 13:59]
this was posted a while ago i thought but its good leglize it its just a plant
not like meth cocain ex ......ect
[#49598]
Written by: bobbydd [05/08/2007, 14:11]
there is an hdtv version of this
[#49600]
Written by: drharris [05/08/2007, 14:31]
Quote by talon.nl
.nl means netherlands you retarded self-centered americans.
lol, it's like seeing monkeys talk.
and "talon" means 14 year old girl, you little girl.
[#49617]
Written by: saintdesy [05/08/2007, 15:14]
what you said in response to me was a contradiction to what was implied
previously and i was responding to: that all people who smoke pot are incompetents
who barely can handle a job at mcdonalds.
also, comparing someone who may smoke weed occasionally to people who "go
through 3 packs a day, get drunk daily, and buy 10 diseased hookers a night" or
even someone who is "on cocaine 24/7" is laughably ridiculous. you are saying
that low to moderate use of a non-toxic substance is equal to extreme overuse of
toxic ones.
[#49628]
Written by: FidelMFCastro [05/08/2007, 15:51]
null
[#49637]
Written by: uolamer [05/08/2007, 17:31]
i would at least legalize medical use... good friend is a quadriplegic, cant
move his legs, it stops his muscle spasms without all the side effects of legal
narcotic drugs he tried for years. when you watch a person who cant move their
legs go all shaking.. and then a min after some pot they stop...
[#49644]
Written by: evilgus [05/08/2007, 18:46]
anyone who has never smoked it is not entitled to hold an opinion on it. even
moreso if they bring in rubbish about religion.
i find it strange that anyone would be in favour of restricting another's rights
to the extent of not allowing them to smoke a plant. isn't that fascism?
[#49647]
Written by: God2 [05/08/2007, 19:06]
i fucked the virgin mary while stoned out of my mind. i didn't wear a condom
because we're catholics.
[#49652]
Written by: Budking [05/08/2007, 19:19]
read what the nas has to say because they represent scientists:
books.nap.edu/html/marimed/
pot is much less harmful than alcohol or tobacco, that doesn't mean it is
benign, but it does mean there is hypocrisy in the law (her ein the usa).
