is anybody really annoyed by that 2005? ridiculous discussion, i think...
great episode! now i hope for a better version of the confidential, the one that is around (sirpaul, or somethin) was
horrible, oos, noises and a bad picture - i still was too curious and watched it ;-)
he got dragged into helping a friend, then got beheaded ( not really his fault he was a coward )
and then his head gets stuck in a musty dank cave to rot, alone and aware...........
didn't the doctor feel any obligation to him after all that ????
what i'd like to see for next season is either a rogue cyberman, or dalek, or both.
rogue in that they are against everything their race represents, and the doctor has a real
problem believing it............understandably.
both races are practical and logical, except where their core beliefs are concerned. if these
were examined in detail they would be seen as unworkable and insane. time they realized it.
lol you crack me up with the history lesson i am 45 years old been watchng dr who since i was a little
kid my question didnt relate to the history of dr who it was more about the naming convention here on
eztv at a glance eztv dosent go back that far to 1963 - 1989 with any other episode as far as i can see
so i figured why not just call it what it is now which is 2011 seeing nothing else here is named like that i
do understand your trying to be factual with date in keeping with the dr who tradtion but all i was
stating is it probally confuses people seeing that date and thinking they are downloading a episode from
2005 do you get what i am saying 😉 hehe cheers though for the reply
personally, i'd like to know why so many shows continue to stay on the airing list even when they
are on looooong breaks, as in the case of dr. who 2005.