|
Please login to reply
| 3 of 4 |
|
|||||
|
[#58713]
Written by: Ven [29/09/2007, 20:08] |
|||||
im open to watching most b-grade crap for a laugh, but honestly this show is shit. sorry to be so blunt even, i have nothing positive to say about it. each to their own, though. |
|||||
|
[#58758]
Written by: aibi [30/09/2007, 03:26] |
|||||
| blood ties is so much better, and that's not saying much. | |||||
|
[#58774]
Written by: [30/09/2007, 07:18] |
|||||
|
what a terrible intro of tell tell tell. they could have showed all of that through the first episode. why do potentially good shows just love to treat viewers like idiots? blah tv. *deletes ep off hdd* |
|||||
|
[#58776]
Written by: MeatBiProduct [30/09/2007, 07:40] |
|||||
i'm waiting for a detective with ocd myself. |
|||||
|
[#58842]
Written by: msalmank [30/09/2007, 17:30] |
|||||
|
i don't know what everyone is talking about - well some of you. this was a great show. way better than bloodties. it's definitely going on my list. so far; moonlight, reaper, chuck, gossip girl, and bionic woman from the new series have gone on my list. hated private practice but will be giving that a chance. and have already downloaded big shots, life, and journeyman and will view 'em soon. did i miss any other new show? |
|||||
|
[#58844]
Written by: kurai [30/09/2007, 17:55] |
|||||
|
finally got around to watching this. man, what a pile of shit. i have nothing against the willing suspension of disbelief & the whole vampire thing - i was willing to sit through blade: the series despite kirk jones' extraordinary woodenness and blood ties despite the willful cheesiness, but this was just formulaic beyond belief. it doesn't reach the incredible depths of unremitting awfullness of painkiller jane or flash gordon, but more like a bunch of cynical producers who haven't actually watched tv for decades ordered a troupe of assistants to take every vampire/detective/reporter show made in the last 10 years, shove them in a blender, then filter the resultant goo to remove every last stray molecule of originality and interest. this isn't blood sucking - it's soul sucking. |
|||||
|
[#58952]
Written by: lexein [01/10/2007, 02:45] |
|||||
|
so, blah, you vant to go back to my place? blah. - count blah, from greg the bunny. i ain't going to work for no soul-sucking jerk i'm gonna take it all back and i ain't saying jack [repeat] -beck, soul suckin jerk, mellow gold never used in a tv show. |
|||||
|
[#58959]
Written by: MarvMcMurphy [01/10/2007, 03:05] |
|||||
|
i also thought that is wasn't good, had to force myself to finish it and definitely won't download any more episodes. so far i like pushing daisies (still not really out though), reaper, journeyman, life. not sure yet about: big shots, dirty sexy money, cane, bionic woman, chuck, back to you (who came up with that crappy title btw?), gossip girl - these shows have potential but didn't really convince/disappoint me yet for a final judgment. |
|||||
|
[#58969]
Written by: jtrocks [01/10/2007, 03:59] |
|||||
|
has anyone experienced trouble with this tracker? |
|||||
|
[#58977]
Written by: jtrocks [01/10/2007, 05:12] |
|||||
|
from tracker: http://opentracker.blog.h3q.com/  server problems october 1st, 2007 we have some serious problems with our server, the system kept crashing on us and as the server hosts some other services beside the tracker as well, we decided to shutdown the tracker partially to prevent those other services from suffering anymore until we get our own server. while the udp part (udp:// denis.stalker.h3q.com:6969) is still up and running, tcp connections (http://denis.stalker.h3q.com:6969) are blocked for now as they are the stuff that make most of the load. we already have new hardware, kindly donated by someone (thanks!), with a fresh system in our hands and we hope we can move our tracker to the new server and bring the tracker fully back online on tuesday or thursday. |
|||||
|
[#59079]
Written by: hang [01/10/2007, 14:51] |
|||||
| this show rocks. worth the download. not your typical vampire drama crapp. | |||||
|
[#59185]
Written by: darkbros [01/10/2007, 21:36] |
|||||
|
forever knight did this better. :-( if they don\'t give the vamp a \"big bad\" to fight, this show, no matter its female viewership, will be over and done by nov. sweeps. |
|||||
|
[#59317]
Written by: ammie119 [03/10/2007, 01:41] |
|||||
|
the world of vampires didn't start with buffy and angel. moonlight is derivative of so very many things: the intro, which was wincingly bad was a rip off of "the interview with the vampire", those goofy head/car shots was and the story-line between the vamp and the reporter is totally sin city and boy, didn't fred saberhagen write a vampire detective in old friend of the family? i was prepared to hate this and i almost did, and then i liked it. i know the acting is kind of clunky, but endearingly so... the actors are young and inexperienced; they aren't blocks of wood, they'll get better. david borealous was almost unwatchable up until the second season of angel. i don't know. it just won me over. |
|||||
|
[#60230]
Written by: carouselboy [05/10/2007, 21:14] |
|||||
| a rather amusing show. | |||||
|
[#60244]
Written by: nbucking [05/10/2007, 22:40] |
|||||
|
hopefully this is as good as angel. i mean they make shows similar right? look at the old westerns or star trek. once a good genre comes along you have to keep with it. |
|||||
|
| 3 of 4 |
|
|||||
