for those of you waiting for the rerip, don't hold up for it, it won't be
released, and i'll explain why.
per scene rules, in order for it to be labelled as a dsr, the video has to be
captured digitally (dvi or hdmi), the first release was probably captured via
component, which still gives you good picture quality, it just ends up going
through an analog-digital conversion.
so basically there's no real point in wasting the bandwidth to seed the rerip as
the quality is going to be the same.
- cj
[#51833]
Written by: kavselj [20/08/2007, 07:12]
Quote by cjlucas
for those of you waiting for the rerip, don't hold up for it, it
won't be
released, and i'll explain why.
per scene rules, in order for it to be labelled as a dsr, the video has to be
captured digitally (dvi or hdmi), the first release was probably captured via
component, which still gives you good picture quality, it just ends up going
through an analog-digital conversion.
so basically there's no real point in wasting the bandwidth to seed the rerip as
the quality is going to be the same.
- cj
this is the reason for rerip
Quote
notes: last one had some strange delay in last part
causing it to have been out of sync. sorry for the mistake.
quality may be the same, having out of sync is not good
[#51987]
Written by: DungeonRaider [20/08/2007, 22:03]
loki re-ripped it because in their opinion the last part is oos.
and loki's nfo has a standard description explaining the difference between
analog and digital rip and stating that using analog at all should not be
labelled dsr.. so if they label it dsr then it is digital.
| 1 of 1 |
