as soon as possible released too soon, forgetting the last one minute and
forty-nine seconds of this fine episode of a wonderful television series.
should not the people who were behind this format be able to use it
correctly? perhaps they can also fix their multiplexer so we can watch
their video as it downloads, like we can with laugh out loud releases.
duration: 50 minutes and 15 seconds
video: x264 r2164 --preset slow --level 3.1 --crf 19 --colormatrix bt709
(1044 kilobits per second average)
audio: nero advanced audio coder/decoder low complexity -q 0.5
(150 kilobits per second average)
eztv does not record the shows
eztv does not encode the show
eztv has no control over file formats or torrent file names
eztv does not communicate with "the scene" release groups
the .mp4's aren't that bad. for me it's better quality and smaller file size. kinda my dream
situation to be honest. i mean i was pretty pissed and scared when they said they would stop posting
avi altogether but it's ok. i'm satisfied at least.
@reloop -- to answer your question, there is nothing up my ass. what's up yours?
i was referring to this part of his comment, "perhaps they can also fix their multiplexer so we can watch
their video as it downloads, like we can with laugh out loud releases."
since eztv does not cap, encode, upload torrents, or communicate with "the scene" release groups
(the people who actually cap/record the show), the suggestion is wasted here.
i guess i could have just ignored this one and moved along. it's just that i get fed up with people not
understanding what it is that eztv does or doesn't do...and making suggestions or request that have
nothing to do with eztv.
it's just that i get fed up with people not understanding what it is that eztv does or
doesn't do...and making suggestions or request that have nothing to do with eztv.
perfectly sensible reaction - but in this case, the misunderstanding was entirely yours. i simply posted an
excerpt from the nfo file, so this is quote toosoon unquote talking to asap, not me talking to eztv. since
that's common practice for proper threads, i figured the "nfo" at the top would be sufficient clarification,
no?
it's just that i get fed up with people not understanding what it
is that eztv does or
doesn't do...and making suggestions or request that have nothing to do with eztv.
perfectly sensible reaction - but in this case, the misunderstanding was entirely yours. i simply posted
an excerpt from the nfo file, so this is quote toosoon unquote talking to asap, not me talking to eztv.
since that's common practice for proper threads, i figured the "nfo" at the top would be sufficient
clarification, no?
you have my humble apology.
you are 100% correct. i totally misunderstood and over-reacted.
i should have seen that it was an excerpt from the nfo file.