thanks for the upload.
hmph, i absolutely love mythbusters, but.. unfortunately their methods aren't an exact science and they
leave a lot out which pisses me off more than it should.
one major flaw i have with the second myth.. (smashing 2 cars together and detonating an un-mixed
explosive) is.. in the instances they showed neither cars where running.. which leaves out countless
other variables! if 2 cars in fact did crash, the engine would be spinning in one, which in turn would be
spinning the alternator and giving energy to the vehicle. any of these components could interact with the
environment in the trunk and cause a source of a spark/ignition sequence.
not to mention the car thats being hit would have a muffler that is dumping out massive amounts of hot
fumes, that pipe jamming up into the trunk would cause energy to be dispersed from the heat.
aaaaaghh!
lol.
hmph, i absolutely love mythbusters, but.. unfortunately their methods aren't an exact science and they
leave a lot out which pisses me off more than it should.
one major flaw i have with the second myth.. (smashing 2 cars together and detonating an un-mixed
explosive) is.. in the instances they showed neither cars where running.. which leaves out countless
other variables! if 2 cars in fact did crash, the engine would be spinning in one, which in turn would be
spinning the alternator and giving energy to the vehicle. any of these components could interact with the
environment in the trunk and cause a source of a spark/ignition sequence.
not to mention the car thats being hit would have a muffler that is dumping out massive amounts of hot
fumes, that pipe jamming up into the trunk would cause energy to be dispersed from the heat.
aaaaaghh!
lol.
