i only watched the first episode of the first season and resented the 47 minutes of my life i'd wasted.
shame. why are stephen king adaptations always sooooo bad?
i only watched the first episode of the first season and resented the 47 minutes of
my life i'd wasted.
shame. why are stephen king adaptations always sooooo bad?
all books are.
i guess it's because someone else's imagination is never going to be as entertaining to you as your own
dexter is the only 1 iv'e liked but then iv'e only read the 1st book (years ago, waiting for the
show to end b4 i read the rest)
as for king, i think there is another "it" comming next year, rated r so hopefully that will be ok
edit: also i read dexter 1/2 way through the 1st season so i had mostly the same chars from the show
in my head anyway
better acting and writing than falling skies so i think its not bad.
its not as good as fringe and not as bad as sanctuary so imo its a nice series with not too high of a budget
and so far better than some of the over-the-top commercial crap some networks make nowadays.
either way i like the sets and scenery in this series and the slow pace actually fits that way.
rofl. add? possibly. all the brainiest people are, after all. there's also a thing called discretion. the
best i can say for haven is that it's nowhere near as bad as falling skies. nothing is as bad as falling
skies.