really? it has a name. "burn notice: the fall of sam axe"!!!!!!
(energetic encoders, lazy titling.)
the release by fqm was - burn.notice.the.fall.of.sam.axe.2011.hdtv.xvid-fqm
which means either eztv or of vtv changed it but if you even took 2 seconds
to search you would have seen that. so fqm did their part and they = energetic
encoder and energetic "titling"
geez you get the stuff for free and still complain. sad.....
i have been thinking about this all day in work. i'm beside myself with excitement...
... seriously, i don't think i've been this excited about a telly programme since i was a kid...
laugh all you want - i can't wait to see this
woop woop wippee...
(ps - i'm middle aged, i even surprised myself when i hugged myself when it came up onto eztv - you
have to laugh)
really? it has a name. "burn notice: the fall of sam axe"!!!!!!
(energetic encoders, lazy titling.)
in all fairness, it'll have been done so people...well, morons who haven't yet discovered google...don't
think "omg jebus, burn notice is back!! :d *squeeeeeee* "
i found this show too long 1.5 hours and it was just bad, bad acting from all
supporting characters. humor
was dumb too. i give it 2 stars out of 5.
i havent watched it yet but i dont see how it could have bad acting - unless of course you think the
regular series is bad acting. same thing for the humor really. unless its somehow a drastic change
from the writing/acting of the weekly... i take it you don't normally watch burn notice?
really? it has a name. "burn notice: the fall of sam axe"!!!!!!
(energetic encoders, lazy titling.)
the release by fqm was - burn.notice.the.fall.of.sam.axe.2011.hdtv.xvid-fqm
which means either eztv or of vtv changed it but if you even took 2 seconds
to search you would have seen that. so fqm did their part and they = energetic
encoder and energetic "titling"
geez you get the stuff for free and still complain. sad.....
if you knew how to read english properly, you'd see the division in who i'm talking about. encoders (fqm)
and titlers(eztv or vtv).
i also never complained about the free entertainment. the title also would only come up by using burn
notice alone. hunt for "the fall of sam axe"? zero hits.
next time, think, then reply.
really? it has a name. "burn notice: the fall of sam axe"!!!!!!
(energetic encoders, lazy titling.)
in all fairness, it'll have been done so people...well, morons who haven't yet discovered google...don't
think "omg jebus, burn notice is back!! :d *squeeeeeee* "
cheers for the upload.
the smarter of us check all sources (imdb, show station site, google) before we think something is back.
i found this show too long 1.5 hours and it was just bad, bad
acting from all
supporting characters. humor
was dumb too. i give it 2 stars out of 5.
i havent watched it yet but i dont see how it could have bad acting - unless of course you think the
regular series is bad acting. same thing for the humor really. unless its somehow a drastic change
from the writing/acting of the weekly... i take it you don't normally watch burn notice?
just finished watching it. its not that great... and im a huge burn notice fan. its watchable, but
not even remotely as good as a regular series episode - though admittedly my favorite characters in
order are fiona, michael, madeline, jesse and then sam so that is probably part of it.
i kinda felt like i was watching a crappy adaptation of army of darkness.
disappointing, i don't remember burn notice ever being this bad.
its watchable of course but its not as interesting and the acting is not as good as burn notice.
wanted a sam axe story but instead it was just a long cliche' american hero story that wasn't close to
believable.
and don't get me wrong i love burn notice the series because of its cleverness and character but if this had
any of that it kind of fell in between the poor scripting so it was kind of bad and very predictable.
i thought it was great. fun and entertaining, snappy dialogue, a few twists and turns. not hamlet,
but what do you want from a tv movie? relax and enjoy.